Easter Sunrise, March 31, 2021
My
grandmother’s house, was always a buzzing hive of activity. On this night, as the adults sat hunkered
around the table in steely-eyed consideration of their Diamonds, Spades,
Hearts, and Clubs, I about 8, hovered behind, wondering when I would be old
enough to learn Pinochle, a Tennant family rite of passage. “Twenty-one.” My Papa cut the tension-filled
air with his opening bid. Betraying
nothing but surveying his own hand with concentration and brain surgeon would
envy, My Uncle Ed considered his response.
That’s when a shrill scream pierced the anxious quiet.
Like
EMT’s filing out of the ambulance, we all vacated the kitchen and made for the
source of terror, My Aunt Jane. Lounging
lazily on the livingroom couch, her eyes glanced up to see demonic face peering
in. It was her pranking older brother,
My Uncle Jim, delighted by the terror he caused.
This
was 1978. Channeling his own “easy-rider,”
Jim had taken off on his motorcycle with no plans other than to leave Michigan
and head west. With no cellphones, My
Meme didn’t know if her third son was lost somewhere in Utah, soaking up the
sun on a Pacific beach, or right back here in Michigan, once again terrorizing
her only daughter, my Aunt Jane. Jane’s
astonished scream announced how unexpected his arrival was.
When
were you last disoriented by something thoroughly surprising? Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and
Salome go to the tomb intent on caring for Jesus’ dead body. They meet an unnamed young man, notably
dressed in white, and discover Jesus’ tomb is empty. The Gospel writer Mark says they were seized
by, in Greek, ‘tromos’ and ‘ekstasis;’ ‘trembling’ and ‘confused astonishment.’
My Aunt Jane
surely needed a few minutes to recover the shock of her brother’s unannounced
arrival. Disruptions throw us off. Once our hearts stop racing though, we can
begin to make sense of reality, accounting for what has happened and how it
changed things. The trauma is brief. She wasn’t entirely sorry her brother, who
picked on her a lot growing up, had gone on a western walkabout; but, she was
also probably, once the shock wore off, happy for his safe return.
Could Mary,
Mary, and Salome recover as quickly?
Resurrection is just a bit more destabilizing than the return of a
prodigal son. In most cases, we expect
the dead and buried to stay dead and buried.
The women we meet approaching the tomb in Mark 16 would have lived by the
beliefs of 1st century Messianic Judaism. They believed the dead would rise and be
judged, on the last day. Prior to
that day, they did not expect any resurrection.
They also
believed a Messiah would come, sent by God to restore the fortunes of
Israel. They did not believe that
Messiah would be divine. They did not
expect that Messiah to die and then rise prior to the end time
resurrection. In fact, if someone
thought to be the Messiah did in fact die, especially a death as shameful as
crucifixion at the hands of the dreaded Romans the Messiah was supposed to defeat,
his death would prove him to be a failed Messiah! Such a view would not mean these women were guilty
of lacking faith. They simply lived
within the worldview of their times.
They heard the things Jesus had said about his own approaching
resurrection. They loved him, so they
listened intently to his sermons. They
believed, but when he died, they also were quite sure he’d stay dead.
On the day
that we read about in the Gospels, the women, overwhelmed by grief, expected a
dead body. Fluctuating between the dumb
absence of feeling numb and excruciating, debilitating grief, it was all they
could do to carry out their task of mercy, preparation of the body of one they
loved for final burial. We’re never
ready for a surprise, but soaked in sorrow, they were especially
unprepared. These women, Jesus’ most
faithful followers in the darkest of hours, were sure the story was over.
We’re never
given a comprehensive list of the women who followed Jesus. The 12 named male disciples found listed in
Matthew, Mark, and Luke, formulaically hearkens to the 12 tribes, as the Gospel
writers envisioned Jesus awakening the calling of God’s chosen people,
Israel. John offers no such list and
the other three who do, do not offer identical lists. Matthew and Mark include Thaddeus. Luke, in place of Thaddeus, has a discipled
called Judas son of James. Acts chapter
1 makes it clear that the community of disciples was larger than 12 all the way
through Jesus’ story.
Perhaps we could
construct a list of women. At least three were named Mary. There was Joanna, Salome, Junia (Romans 16),
and many others. Ancient custom did not
count the testimony of women to be as reliable as that of men. However, in spite of this misogynistic
attitude, the Gospel writers identify these female disciples as the first
witnesses of the resurrection. The event
that undid history and humanity’s understanding of the way things are rested on
the testimony of women who had the temerity to approach the tomb while their
male counterparts huddled in fear behind locked doors.
These women
visited the tomb of a seditious, condemned criminal. So unbelievable is
both this story and how it first came to us, some, even today, refuse to
believe it. Bible scholar John Dominic
Crossan, a dedicated student of the gospels but also committed adherent to
natural causes rejects any divine input in the course of history. The women never came to the tomb. According
to Dr. Crossan all that we read in Mark 16 is fiction, created by Mark to
justify the beginning of Christianity.
After
crucifixions, the Romans threw the corpses into a pit, a mass, unmarked
grave. Crossan places his confidence in
his knowledge of Roman tradition and his certainty that God, if there is a god,
does not interfere in human affairs.
Crossan’s
conclusion runs right into the inferior place assigned to women in
antiquity. If Mark concocted a false
narrative intended to prove that a dead Jesus was actually alive, would he make
women his prime witnesses? Already this story demands anyone who believes
it to completely change their understanding of resurrection. Now Mark’s asking people to willingly accept
that paradigm shift on, what would have been taken as woefully shaky testimony? Crossan may think he’s grounded his skepticism
in science, but it fails the test of logic.
Standing on
deduction and documentary evidence, I believe without doubt that the women
really did set out early on Sunday morning as Mark said they did. Their
testimony along with the fact that shortly after that day, a group of Jews claimed
that Jesus was the Messiah and was God in the flesh – an unprecedented claim –
convinces me that the resurrection really did happen as Mark reports.
It was as
unbelievable as it was unsettling.
Imagine your reaction if one of the members of our church whose funeral
we hosted in last two to three years walked in here for worship this
morning. You can’t imagine because we
simply do not believe it will happen.
Remember the
words Mark used to describe the women - Greek, ‘tromos’ and ‘ekstasis;’
‘trembling’ and ‘confused astonishment.’
One sense of the Greek is that one is so overwhelmed by some unexpected
event it is as if one has fallen into a trance. In the version of the
Bible called The Message, translator Eugene Peterson tries to
capture this rendering it this way. “Their heads were swimming.”
The women,
Mark writes, “Said nothing to anyone for they were afraid.” Most likely,
notations in your Bible cite verse 8 as the original ending of Mark and then
after that there are notes indicating the “shorter” and “longer” endings. Scholars almost universally agree those
“shorter” and “longer” endings were added much, much later.
Verse 8 is
accepted as the original ending. Most
translations say, “They ran out for they were afraid,” but the Greek
literally says, “They were afraid for …” and it stops. The conjunction is
the final word.
Imagine Mark
is here, presenting his account of Jesus.
We hear from his own mouth the very first reading! We lean forward, pushed to the edge of our
seats by his fast-paced prose. He tells us Jesus has been raised! What
will the women do? “They ran out. They were afraid. For” … And he
stops! He smiles as if to say, OK, you finish it.
Will we?
Will we allow this story to topple what we knew to be certain – that dead
people stay dead? Will we listen as Mark tells of dead guy who didn’t
stay dead? Jesus rose from death. Can
we believe it? Will we allow ourselves
to be confronted by Easter?
All people
die, everyone; you, me, everyone.
Death is not
the end. Jesus has risen from death and prepared
a way for us. His followers will rise
and be with him. too. This is as
sure as anything we can be sure of. It
seems unbelievable! By evidence, by
logic, and by faith, I join those women, and the writer, Mark, and millions of
Christ followers in definitively declaring that the unbelievable has
happened! Will we believe it? Will we choose to follow the risen
Christ? Mark knows the answer comes when
we respond to the story by putting our faith in Jesus. God call us to write the ending of the
story.
AMEN
Hi, is a true life experience is not designed to convince you its a personal health experience, sometimes medical doctors take a different approach about herpes treatment. i has been stocked in bondage with herpes for two years and four months i has tried different means to eliminate this sickness because it surely has distract me even with the world, and i was told there is no cure, but only medicine for treatment all the possible ways i has tried was treatment, two months back i did some herpes research and i found amazing testimonies concerning natural herbal cure, and i go for it through the email address from the post just to give a try of herbal treatment, and i found it grate without delay i got cured with natural treatment from doc Twaha herbal cure his cure are powerful and shows out excellent result. and i think everyone suffering with herpes and others symptoms should also know about this cure from, drlregbeyen10000@gmail.com or WhatsApp him +2349038518881 thank you
ReplyDelete