Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label New Testament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Testament. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Messiah in the Old Testament - some final thoughts (for now)

A Final Post on The Messiah in the Old Testament (Walter Kaiser)

            I am loathe to write this post because if you read my blogs regularly, you know at the beginning of 2016, I intended to write blog posts throughout the year reacting to Kaiser’s book.  He makes the case that anticipation of Jesus coming as Messiah (Anointed one of God, the Christ) is seen in the Old Testament.  According to Kaiser, from Genesis to Malachi, there is unmistakable evidence of the Messiah’s presence in the Old Testament.  I wanted to learn Kaiser’s perspective and share it with you, my readers. 
            I did OK through the Pentateuch (Genesis-Deuteronomy) and I reviewed his assessment of OT books up through the Psalms.   Alas, time caught up with me.  Some of Kaiser’s meatiest work is done in the prophets.  In 2016, other interests (family life, church, study of racial dynamic in American life) took me away from working on writing my responses to the ideas in this book. 
            So now, I conclude by recommending that you go to Amazon (or whatever site you prefer) and get your own copy of Kaiser’s book. 
            I do offer this.  I have only recently come to appreciate just how important and controversial it is to think that New Testament concepts arose first in the Old Testament and then served as fulfillment of the Old Testament.  For Jewish people who do not believe Jesus is the Messiah, this is a great insult.  For them, the Old Testament is not “Old.”  It is “the Bible,” the Torah.  Some Jews may feel that their book was stolen from them by the same Christians who perpetrated the Pogroms and ignored the Holocaust.  I think the story is more complicated than that, but I want to be gentle with the feelings of others, especially those who have suffered enormous wounding in history.
            I want to respect the Jewish reading of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament).  I want to be in dialogue with Jewish friends and neighbors.  I want to learn about this sacred text from them; they’re the experts.  If I see something about the Messiah (Jesus as Messiah) in Psalm 22 or Genesis 3 or Isaiah 53, something my Jewish friends don’t see or refuse to see, I want to come to that knowledge humbly.  I want to hold that reading reverently and with no intent to marginalize or discard the Jewish viewpoint.
            At the same time, I recognize the absolute nature of this conversation.  Either Jesus is the Messiah or he isn’t.  I believe he is.  I believe His Holy Spirit resides in me and compels me to read the Hebrew Bible through Gospel-tinted lenses.  I believe what Kaiser says is true.  “A straightforward understanding and application of the text leads one straight to the Messiah and to Jesus of Nazareth, who has fulfilled everything these texts said about his first coming” (p.232).
            Thus, I live in this tension.  I want to love and respect my Jewish neighbor who says “Don’t undermine my Bible by insisting that its message is fulfilled in Jesus.”  At the same, I believe scripture (including the Old Testament) can be properly only when read in such a way that we see that the message points to Jesus.  The Bible is about God’s relationship with humanity, and God’s relationship with humanity is made whole through the death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth who is the Christ, the Messiah.  I believe that with all my being, all my soul.

            I pray that conversations around this topic can be peaceful and friendly, even if they end in disagreement.

Friday, January 8, 2016

Reflection from Walter Kaiser's "The Messiah in the Old Testament" - intro

Comments on The Messiah in the Old Testament – Opening Remarks

            In the 1720’s Anthony Collins published two works in which he attempted to show that “the literal meaning of certain messianic proof-texts from the OT could not support the messianic interpretation placed on them by the NT.  … The so-called ‘complete’ or ‘spiritual’ fulfillment of these OT texts that many were applying to Jesus, Collins concluded, could be no more than an illustration” (Kaiser, p.14).  The eighteenth century scholar Collins felt that there was no proof that Jesus had been anticipated as ‘messiah.’
            Kaiser then lists 7 methods of interpretation of prophecy used to overcome the challenge posed by Collins. 
1.      Dual meaning.  There might be an original meaning of a text, say from Isaiah’s time, and that meaning stood in Isaiah’s day.  This prophecy had a later, fuller meaning, to which messianic interpretation and application could be attached.  This method came from Thomas Sherlock in 1732.  The problem with this is the loss of predictive value.  The prophecy said something in Isaiah’s day, but they did not ‘predict’ something else, a future ‘anointed one’ of the Lord.
2.     Single meaning.  This view from J.G. Herder and J.G. Eichhorn declared the only meaning of prophecy to be its original meaning.  There was no secondary application.  Eichhorn was convinced that the last three decades of the 1700’s completely erased the idea that the OT prophets predicted anything.  The Bible reader had to discern the individual prophet’s life in order to glean hope for the future.  I have to say, I have real trouble understanding this method based on the brief description.  To me it seems like a reiteration of Collins’ original thought.
3.     New Testament meaning.  From 1828-1858, E.W. von Hengstenberg published and re-published a 3-volume work on prophecy.  In it, he gave final arbitration to New Testament authors.  For him, they determined how to understand the OT texts considered ‘messianic.’  His critics said his reading was dogmatic and ignored the historical context of Jeremiah or Hosea or whatever prophet was in question.
4.     Developmental meaning.  Nineteenth century scholar Franz Delitzsch could see that there were pericopes[i] used to support the idea of messianic prediction, but these passage simply did not provide that support.  They clearly contained different meaning (Kaiser does not provide an example on p.21 where this method is described).  So, he took a tact different than Hengstenberg.  Delitzsch saw the meaning of such passages developing.  The prophecies did not contain an absolute prediction but there was more to their meaning than the original OT understanding yielded.  The full development of the meaning was seen in later doctrine and Christian experience.  As I write this, I am conscious of the fact that I do not clearly see the distinction Kaiser is drawing between Hengstenberg and Delitzsch.
5.     Goal Meaning.  A.F. Kirkpatrick, in 1897, proposed that Jesus was the ethical and moral goal of what the OT prophets had in mind.  He did not fulfill specific and detailed promises.  He united all the lines of prophecy by filling them with new meaning.  Of course this rendered each individual pericope of Isaiah or Zechariah vague and void of specific significance.
6.    Relecture Meaning.  This is a process of reading old prophecies in a new way so that they have new meaning (without removing their original meaning).  This process appears encouraging (for Christians who want Jesus to be the fulfillment of the OT), but it is too subjective.  It cannot be sustained and it cannot have any sort of precision in identifying the history of a passage.
7.     Theological Meaning.  Whether or not Jesus fulfilled the words of OT prophets historically, theologically, what the prophets aimed for was the Messiah who was Jesus (even if the prophets themselves were not fully away of this).  H.G.A. Ewald said the history of Israel would find consummation and its final stage of growth in the Christian church.  I have talked to many Jews and read works by many others; they would nearly all be thoroughly offended by Ewald’s suggestion.

These seven meanings applied to prophecies considered potentially messianic are not necessarily Kaiser’s thought.  Rather, he summarized them on pages 19-22 in order to trace the history of how readers have tried to tie the OT to the NT.  Where does he come down in this conversation?
He thinks all seven procedures are self-defeating (p. 27) essentially because they are not comprehensive enough.  Each approach zeroes in on specific OT passages and in one way or another tries to draw a line to a NT idea.  But Bible verses or even entire passages cannot be ripped out of the Bible.  They must be read within the story.  The story shows that God has a single, unified plan.
Prophecies made within the course of the story are based on a relationship with the God who makes the promise.  Those prophecies, some of which might be categorized as ‘messianic,’ are not predictions the way we understand the notion of prediction. 
It is not like saying “Detroit will beat Green Bay 18-16.”  Would that prediction be right if Detroit beat Green Bay 21-7?  Or would it be right if Green Bay beat Detroit 18-16?  This is not what is happening in the OT words we have in the Bible in Amos and Joel and the Psalms and Ezekiel and the rest.  The words in the Bible come in the flow of people who are in relationship with the God of promise.  The prophetic words are seeds full of God’s promise. 
We only see the fullness of the potential of the seed as it blooms.  It is alive and growing along the way.  Isaiah’s words in chapter 45-55 spoke to Israelites in exile in Babylon in the late 6th century BC.  But when that era passed, Isaiah’s words did not stop speaking.  Rather, his words that have become scripture were infused with the wisdom and inspiration of the Holy Spirit.  As time went out, the message grew and “filled out” as a flower does.  The full bloom is seen in Christ.  He said as much (Matthew 5:17).
Here is what Kaiser has to say.  “We conclude, therefore, that the messianic doctrine is located in God’s single, unified plan, called in the NT his ‘promise,’ which is eternal in its fulfillment but climactic in its final accomplishments, while being built up by historical fulfillments that are part and parcel of that single ongoing plan as it moved toward its final plateau.  Thus what began simply as a ‘word’ about who God was and what he was going to do for a select group of people became a word that was intended from the start to be cosmopolitan in its effects, for it announced simultaneously who God was and what he was going to do for all the other nations on earth through this one group” (p.31).
After this introduction, Kaiser goes to a place that surprised me.  The title of chapter 2 is “The Messiah in the Pentateuch.”[ii]  I did not expect to find words pointing to Messiah in those first five books.  I think that is part of Kaiser’s point about the unity of the Biblical story.  I should have expected to find the Messiah there.  In my next post, I’ll share how Kaiser does that.



[i] Pericope – an extract from a text, especially the Bible https://www.google.com/search?q=pericope&oq=pe&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i60j69i61j69i60j69i59.2360j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
[ii] Pentateuch refers to Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Love the Children of God




            “The love of God is this, that we obey his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome.”  Those commands are that we love the Lord our God with all our hearts, souls, strength, and minds.  And also, we are to love our neighbors as ourselves.  They aren’t so hard.  This is easy stuff, the things God wants us to do.  It’s not difficult. 
Oh yes it is says blogger and Denver pastor Jodie-Renee Adams who writes for a blog called “the hardest question.”  In her reading of 1st John 5, she calls “time-out.”  On this business of commands not being burdensome she says, “Not to quibble with the best friend of the Messiah, [John], but I’ve never found it easy to do either of those things [love the Lord with all my heart or love my neighbor as myself].[i]  Fpr her, the hardest question is how do I know a child of God?  How do I know if I am child of God and how do I recognize someone else as a child of God?  She goes on to wonder if the determining factor is love - ongoing relational love that costs in a big way.  Are we only truly living life as God’s children when we love sacrificially? 
The tension here is inescapable.  We want to read God’s word and believe it is completely true and trust that it speaks directly into our lives.  I think it does in 1st John 5.  But as we talk about the connection of love and obedience and we realize that it is impossible to be obedient on our own – our obedience to God is directly tied to the way we interact with people around us – and we have to admit that this can get complicated and messy.
Love is seen in our obedience.  The primary commands Jesus gave were to love God and love neighbor.  Problem #1 - our sins keep us from loving God much of the time.  Problem #2 - Sin in general – our own and our neighbors’ make it horribly hard to love those neighbors.  Problem #3 – there are forces of spiritual darkness that will strive to lead us as far away from loving relationships as possible. 
Yet, First John not only says that love and obedience go together but also that Jesus’ commands are not burdensome.  Maybe another word is in order.  We’re talking about relational love here.  Is relational love costly?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German pastor who was executed in a Nazi prison camp for plotting to assassinate Hitler, wrote many books.  His most famous is called The Cost of Discipleship.  Bonhoeffer reflects on the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount.  Jesus said the following.
“I say to you, do not resist an evil doer.  If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also” (Matthew 5:39).
“If anyone … [takes] your coat, give your cloak as well” (v.40).
“If anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile” (v.41).
“I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you” (v.44).
These commands – expressions of radical, sacrificial neighbor love – are burdensome, not easy.  Bonheoffer got it right when he said it costs to be Jesus’ disciple.  There is no room for a cheap grace.  Jesus’ kingdom is not a place where I say the right words or pray the right prayer and thus assure myself of heaven, but live in such a way that it is obvious that Jesus has no influence over me in this life.  We follow a Savior who commands that we love the unlovable and take up our crosses and die to self.  Whatever First John 5:3 means, we cannot accept that the commands of Jesus are not burdensome.
Yet, Christian Philosopher and popular author Dallas Willard says we most definitely can and must embrace these commands and when we do, things in life actually lighten up.  Willard grants that Bonheoffer wrote a masterful attack on cheap grace.[ii]  He agrees with much of what Bonhoeffer said.  However, Willard goes on to say that if discipleship is costly, the cost of non-discipleship is even greater.  “Nondiscipleship costs abiding peace, a life penetrated throughout by love, faith that sees everything in light of God’s overriding governance for good, hopefulness that stands firm in the most discouraging of circumstances, power to do what is right and withstand the forces of evil.”[iii]  The one who chooses to not follow Jesus and obey his commands goes without all these good things and misses out on the abundant life Jesus promised. 
Where Dietrich Bonheoffer turns to Matthew 5, the Sermon on the Mount to show how much Jesus demands, Dallas Willard turns to Matthew 11 to show how light life is when we meet the demands of the master.  Jesus said, “Come to me all you that are weary and are carrying heavy burdens, and I will give you rest.  Take my yoke upon you and learn from me; for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.  For my yoke is easy and my burden is light” (11:28-30).
Back and forth it goes.  Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount– “be perfect as my father in heaven is perfect.”  First John, God’s commands are not burdensome.  Dietrich Bonheoffer – we must yield ourselves to costly, sacrificial discipleship.  Dallas Willard – when we obey God we discover an easy yoke and a light burden.  Contemporary blogger Jodie-Renee Adams – if the yoke is easy and the burden light, why is loving my neighbor so gosh-darned difficult?  First John – “By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and obey his commands” (5:2).

How?  How do we live as children of God?  How do we love the children of God?  Who are they?  If we’re not sure who they are, should we love everybody just we won’t overlook the children of God?  The answer to that question is yes.  Love everyone and especially those we don’t to love. 
Last week, I finished up by challenging each of us to identify those who we find it most difficult to love.  I finished saying,
Who do you find it impossible to love?  Your next door neighbor?  Homosexuals?  Arch conservatives?  Who can you simply not love because the enmity and hate is too deep?  Muslims?  Terrorists?  Communists?  The father who abused you?  The one who broke up with you just before the wedding?  The child who did become the person you thought he should?  Democrats?  Republicans?  Drug addicts?  Convicted child molesters?
As we pray, in your mind, see in your mind the person you find it impossible to love.  Ask God to show you how you will actively love that person this week.

Consider the ways Jesus actively loved people.
            He was with his disciples, probably on a bit of a vacation up North, away from the crowd away from the predominantly Jewish areas, when a Syrophoenician woman came.  She was a gentile and Jesus told her he came for the Jews, but she persisted.  She expressed certainty that he could help her and seeing her faith, he healed her daughter of demon possession.  On this occasion did not want to be bothered.  But he let himself be bothered because he was full God’s compassion.  He healed the gentile woman’s daughter as if she were a daughter of God because that’s exactly what she was.  Jesus listened. The woman appealed to him in faith, and he listened. See Mark 7:24-30.
            A stop in another non-Jewish region, Samaria, brought him into contact with a woman who had been turned out by five husbands and was now living under the roof of a man who wouldn’t even grant her a marriage.  Jesus, a Jewish man, listened to the heart of this Samaritan woman.  He considered her.  She wasn’t just a rejected, lonely woman.  She had ideas about moral propriety.  She had ideas about ecclesiology and theology.  Jesus listened to her, and to her, Jesus revealed the gospel truth and it is in spirit and in truth that we worship God whether we are in Samaria, Judea or somewhere else.  To this broken, cast-out woman, Jesus stopped.  He considered worthy of his time.  See John 4.
            At the end of Mark chapter 10, Jesus is leading the disciples and the crowds in a determined march to Jerusalem.  All in the procession knew Passover was upon them and they would spend it in the city of David.  Only Jesus knew the festivities would include him hanging on a cross.  Yet, as they walked along, Jesus stopped to listen to the voice of Bartimaeus, a blind beggar.  “Son of David, have mercy on me.”  The crowd told the pathetic man in rags to shut up and get out of the way.  And there wasn’t a thing poor Bartimaeus could do about it.  Completely powerless, all he had was a voice, and when he was told to quiet down, he shouted louder.  Jesus called him.  Not only did he call him, but Jesus peered into Bartimaeus’ soul.  On his way to die for the sins of humanity, Jesus made time to stop and listen.  Jesus commended the blind man’s faith and restored his sight.  The one cast aside and treated as dirt was now a sighted man and a new disciple, and Mark tells us he joined the procession.  See Mark 10:46-52.
            In these and other accounts, Jesus shows us how to live out what is taught in 1st John 5.  He noticed people – blind men, begging women.  He stopped.  Even when going somewhere important, he stopped to help others because people matter in God’s scheme of things.  He considered others.  Think about someone you might know who it appears doesn’t have much to offer the world.  Jesus disagrees.  He considers everyone.  He notices, stops, considers, and listens.  How do we love everybody?  We look around us, notice, stop, consider, and listen. 
I agree with Jodi-Renee Adams.  It is hard to love God and love neighbor.  Sin makes it hard.  But I also see Dallas Willard’s point that when we do what Jesus says, we discover that life is beautiful and good, and loving people with the love of Jesus feels wonderful and invigorating.  To obey his commands and love the children of God makes our lives better, and why shouldn’t it?  He promises that we will have an abundant life in which his joy is made complete. 
            To love, we do what Jesus did and do what he said.  Stop.  Notice.  Consider. Listen.  Spend time.  Go the extra mile.  Receive the pain of the wounded soul and return love for pain, beauty for ashes, grace for injury, and gladness for mourning and grief. 
            What does it cost?  Everything that is in us.  To truly love as Jesus loves costs us everything.
            What do we gain?  First John 5:4-5: “Whatever is born of God conquers the world.  And this is the victory that conquers the world, our faith.  Who is it that conquers the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.”
            May we embrace costly discipleship.  May we live under the easy yoke and the difficult but unburdensome commands of Jesus.  May we go out and conquer the world by loving the children of God.
AMEN


[ii] Willard (1988), The Spirit of the Disciplines, HarperSanFrancisco, p.262.
[iii] Ibid, p.263.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Good Friday, 2012

Everyone in the story seemed to wind up at the foot of the cross when Jesus hung their and died slowly and in agonizing fashion. He suffered as he died for the sins of the world. It’s not something I would want to see, yet, somehow, the cross became a gathering place.

Of course there were Roman soldiers. They had to administer the crucifixion and they did so with a demented joy. They performed the task of hammering nails through the hand of another human being – this after they had mercilessly whipped and teased him. It wasn’t enough to beat Jesus up. They had to enjoy it and let him know they enjoyed it.

They were quite busy at the cross. It’s not easy to erect a pole with a man affixed to it and they had to do three of them. One of the soldiers was charged with sticking a spear in Jesus’ side to make sure he was dead, while others used bludgeoning instruments to break the legs of the other two convicts. Yet, for all the work, the soldiers had time for fun. Specifically, they rolled dice to see who would get to keep Jesus’ cloak.

Are they to be pitied, those men who epitomized cruelty? Someone has to be pretty numb and pretty hardened to get to the point that they can inflict such suffering. Only one who himself has been dehumanized can be so dehumanizing. Roman soldiers were there.

So too was a man of North Africa, Simon of Cyrene. He was either a Jewish man living in Cyrene, or he was a black African man who converted to Judaism. Whichever was the case, Simon came to Jerusalem from Cyrene during Passover. He was passing through right at the moment the guards were marching Jesus out to Golgotha. Jesus, weakened by the flogging, couldn’t make the walk. The soldiers grabbed an unfortunate soul out of the crowd to help – Simon.

What was that man thinking? Everyone feared the Romans and tried to avoid them. He couldn’t escape into the crowd fast enough. He found himself unwittingly at the center of the story that would change history. My guess is all he wanted to do was get that cross beam to the site and get out of Jerusalem. But in writing about him, Mark says he had his sons with him, Alexander and Rufus. There are so many characters Mark mentions where he never says a thing about familial relations. No character could be more minor than Simon of Cyrene. So why mention his kids? Would Mark’s readers know who Alexander and Rufus were? In Romans 16 names a man. “Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord; and greet his mother also, a mother to me” (v.13). Is this the same Rufus?

Oh, no. Mark’s just writing his gospel and about at the end, chapter 15, he decides, “I have not included enough detailed information, so, I’ll start now.” And he puts in the names of the sons of a character that is only mentioned in one verse? We don’t know what went through Simon of Cyrene’s head when he was helping Jesus carry the cross. But something happened in his heart that day or soon thereafter. His sons became so involved in the movement of the church, the apostle Paul calls one of them“chosen in the Lord.” And Paul says Simon’s wife was a mother-figure for the apostle himself.

Simon of Cyrene was there. Roman soldiers were there. Who else was at the cross watching as Jesus died?

The religious leaders who condemned Jesus were there rubbing his nose in it. “He saved others, but he can’t save himself.” They had already won by getting the verdict and getting the Romans to do the dirty work (which the Romans were all too eager to do). Now they had to add their two cents worth. “So he is the king of Israel, is he? Let him come down from that cross right now, and we will believe him” (Matthew 27:42).

There were even crowds saying the same thing. People, who had nothing to do with the events or the trial or Jesus, people who were just passing by, stopped the way we do when we see a car crash on the highway. Hopefully when we stop, it is to dial 9-1-1 or help. Not these gawkers. It was like, “Hey here’s someone suffering gruesomely. Let’s watch this, and we’ll play along and mock him as he dies.”

Everyone was there at the cross, watching Jesus’ misery. Roman soldiers; Simon of Cyrene and his boys; religious officials from the temple; anonymous travelers; all get mentioned in the stories in the gospels. So too do a group of women who followed Jesus. Each gospel names some of these women. The list of names is different each time. I am not sure we could put together a comprehensive list of Jesus’ female disciples. They probably included a former prostitute. Jesus’ mother and the mother of James and John were most likely among them. At least a few had money because Luke write in chapter 8 of his gospel that the women disciples were the financial backers who made sure Jesus and the disciples had bread money. We don’t hear a lot of sermons on that passage from the folks who insist that men have to be the head of the household and the boss and the controller of all things in the family and in life. This group of women followed Jesus through every step of the tortured journey. It is also Luke who tells us Jesus speaks to them as he makes his way to Golgotha telling them not to weep for him but for themselves for his passion is a time of judgment and many did not follow Jesus. Those who did not and do not today have to stand before God in their sins without Jesus’ help.

The women were there at the cross. There was a man with them. John’s gospel tells us it was the “disciple whom he loved” (John 19:26). Most readers take that to be the Apostle John, but I am not sure. It says in John 11 that a man named Lazarus was beloved of Jesus. “Beloved” here indicates a special, deep friendship. It is not something erotic or sexual, but filial. I would say of my roommate from college that I love him deeply. John’s gospel says that is how Jesus felt about Lazarus. Was the “beloved disciple” who stood at the foot of the cross Lazarus and not John? I don’t know that we can be sure. Either way, this beloved one stood with the women as they wept and Jesus spoke to him. He entrusted the care of his mother to this disciple. Everyone was there at the cross.

What an odd gathering place. It still is a gathering place, only there’s nothing odd about it now. We’re all here in church on Good Friday. Millions of churches, who like us worship on Sunday, are worshipping today as we are. In languages that would sound strange to most of us – Amharic, Farsi, Mandarin – people around the world worship Jesus. But some of us here, gathered in this place, speak those and a hundred other languages. The universal draw of Jesus’ accomplishment attracts everyone. There are people reading the same scriptures in languages we have found to be hostile – German, 70 years ago; Russian 25 years ago; and languages we find hostile today. Millions of passionately devoted Christ followers worship our Lord and theirs in Arabic. It’s Good Friday. Everyone comes together.

Well, not everyone. Millions of people around us and billions around the world are not in church, worshiping, commemorating the crucifixion of Jesus as a sacrificial death for the sins of the world. I don’t mean here people who are devoted believers but for whatever reason could not make it into church. I mean billions who are not interested in Jesus’ message. They’re not with the church tonight or at any time. But, they do have a role in the story. They play the role of bullying Romans and scoffing religious leaders and mocking crowds and Greeks who challenged Paul in Athens and legalists who tried to assault the early church by denying the sufficiency of the cross for salvation and Gnostics who denied Jesus’ humanity. All the enemies of the gospel from the days of Jesus and the days of the early church still exist today, just in different forms.

We who we weep at his death and rejoice at what comes after (but we’ll save that for Sunday) are not superior to those outside the church. We’re here because we are miserable sinners and we know and we have receive forgiveness, new life, and a fresh start. We receive it all because God gives it. He gives it in the form of his only son, Jesus, dying on the cross for us. As we read in Hebrews 11, “By single offering [Christ] has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.” All who have the Holy Spirit are sanctified. You, me, everyone; all who confess with their mouths and believe in the Lordship of Jesus in their hearts are saved, sanctified, and invited into God’s love. We enter the Bible says by the blood of Jesus (Hebrews 10:19). It’s Good Friday, and it is good because Jesus died thus giving us life.

The early church was comprised of late first century communities that reflected on what Jesus and what that meant for their identity. There was not just one answer. Read 1st, 2nd, and 3rdJohn; it’s not the same as James. James is not very similar to 1st & 2nd Timothy. The Timothys and the Johns and Jude are different that Revelation. I don’t find anything contradictory in these early communities, our spiritual ancestors. They all proclaimed Jesus, but uniquely. Their proclamation and their worship was related to their context.

What was going on when the church that received the letter we call Hebrews, anonymously written, celebrated Good Friday? As we have said previously, the writer wanted that church to reflect theologically and also pragmatically on what it meant to be in relationship with God through Jesus. In addressing the cross, the community knew as we know that crucifixion ended in resurrection. The emotion was not grief but joy at knowing forgiveness is complete, and also determination. Because the story of Jesus true, we won’t let it go even if someone tries to force us to, even if they torture us. We hold fast to our confession (Hebrews 10:23).

Moreover, Hebrews 10 says that in light what the bloody cross means – our sins wiped away– we must provoke one another. What? Hold fast to confession; we understand that. Jesus did because it was true. He died, but he held fast. We must also hold fast. But provoke one another? We provoke one another to love, Hebrews 10:24 says, to love and to the doing of good deeds. For that community, Good Friday was certainly an occasion for deep, meaningful worship. It was also a time to remember who they were in Christ and what God was calling them to do in the world on the Easter side of Good Friday. The beauty of having the witness of all those New Testament communities before us the Bible – 1st & 2nd Peter, Titus, Philemon, James, Revelation, Hebrews, and others – the beauty of it is it all informs us as we understand who God is leading us to be.

We are who we are in Christ when we are together. Good Friday is for us because Jesus is for us. One more note from Hebrews 10; it says, “Do not neglect to meet together … but encourage one another” (v.25). The women disciples were together at Jesus’ cross. The men, who ran and hid, were called together by the resurrected Christ. We are together in worship, when we receive forgiveness and when we lift our praise. Together we provoke one another to love and good deeds done in Jesus’ name. Tonight, together, we will hear the entire passion story read in a merging of the four witnesses, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. We’ll experience the whole story because Jesus is for us and Good Friday is story of our salvation.

AMEN

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

What to Think about Israel? An Email from My Friend

I received the following Email from my friend:

Rob,
Really need some insight and perspective ....
Concerning the modern day Israel and it's place in Biblical prophecy. I unfortunately have two very strict evangelical in-laws who believe ( I think falsely) in strict belief of the divine nature of the modern day Israel and modern Jews. My studies are conflict with their views. I am told I am in violation God's will because I do not agree with this and that anything said in a critical nature towards the actions and or concern for the state of Israel's "goodness" are met with rebukes and prayers to "turn from evil" from these "false beliefs".

The specific passage is Genesis 12:3: I will bless those that bless (Israel) and I will curse those that curse (Israel). (paraphrase) is routinely thrown in my face. What is your take on how so many Christian's interpret this to mean complete blind devotion to Israel, regardless of her actions, influence on and unfettered support by the US government to the modern state of Israel.

I understand what the old testament stories say about Israel, but it is my understanding that the new covenant makes all born again Christian's God's "chosen" people...that today, the Church is the new Israel. I seem to think that most of the truths in the Gospel should supercede anything in the OT...shouldn't they?

I have tried to cross reference in studies and found that in what I have read it is closest to what is said in Galatians 3:8. http://bible.cc/genesis/12-3.htm

But I also understand and have conflict with what my in-laws say as well, because it is taught so heavily in most modern churches and I have only recently changed my mind from this perspective. If you watch a lot of TV as they do, it is the dominant belief in that mainstream Christianity world. Even so, this later belief now causes an uncomfortable visceral reaction in me for some reason because I am more aware that the modern Israel Government does not practice anything resembling true Judaism that honors God. I cannot see how anyone who is not in God's will can be "blessed". IMO, modern Israel, like many nations, is a heathen nation. Totally secular and devoid of God. Not the Israel of the Bible who held strict adherence to Torah.

So anyway..I'm asking if you can give your perspective on what our role is to modern Israel. Let me be clear that I certainly believe we are to bless all men and Jews by loving them, and giving to one another, and anyone else who wishes to "Voluntarily" support Israel in a way they see fit. Key word.."Voluntarily". But I do not wish to be lumped in with "anti christ" to suggest that those that do not wish to have "force" used to do so are out of God's will.

Your thoughts?

T-----

And, my response:
I agree with you that modern Israel is not carrying on the responsibilities laid on Israel by God in Exodus and throughtout the Torah (Genesis-Deuteronomy). There are many passages in the prophets that talk about God withdrawing blessing if Israel fails to keep covenant, and I think Israel as a whole has failed to keep up its end of the covenant. I think the Apostle Paul calls Jews who reject Jesus as Messiah the "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9). In 2nd Peter, you see a pretty harsh invective against false teachers (2 Peter chapter 2), and those false teachers were possible Jews who insisted torah-observance was more important in salvation than Christ. So, the Old Testament warns against Israel failing to keep covenant and the New Testament warns strongly against Jews or anyone else rejecting Jesus.

Romans chapter 9-11 for many people are the definitive chapters on how Christians should view Israel. Unfortunately, there are countless opinions on how to read and apply Romans 9-11.

My take is Jesus is the Messiah and the Savior and salvation comes through him. In studying the gospel, I am not called, either by scripture or by the Holy Spirit to form an opinion on Israel. Israel's eternal fate and the eternal destiny of individual Jews is God's business. I would say the same thing about faithful people who are humble and earnestly, honestly seeking God but have either never heard of Jesus, have only been taught that Christians are enemies from America, or have been taught Christianity by abusive people. In those three scenarios, I think God has mercy for the humble who earnestly, honestly seek Him. I think the only way to Heaven is through Jesus. But I refuse to make definitive statements about the eternal destiny of people. I don't think it's my job to identify who goes to Hell. I think Hell is real, but God gets to say who goes there, not me.

My job is to love with the compassion that Jesus showed. Christians get caught up in talk of Israel or talk of AntiChrist (or abortion or other issues) because that's easier than dealing with the reality of their own sin and their own selfish attitudes.

Read Luke 13:1-5. People wanted Jesus to engage in theological speculation, but he wouldn't play that game. He told those who wanted to sit around and make definitive judgments that they needed to spend more time repenting of their own sins. I doubt that any scriptural proof I could offer will make much headway with your in-laws because their agenda is not faith. It is being right. They are sure they're on the side of those who go to Heaven. They're in the right. So they don't need to repent and they do not need to check their views, regardless of facts that might be presented. It's very much like politics which you follow a lot more closely than me.

The way for the humble, the legitimate truth seekers is faith. And faith requires equal attention paid to Scriptures and to the present, continuous voice of the Holy Spirit. To hear the Holy Spirit, we need to shut out the noise (especially of most TV preachers and much of what is in the media). We need to prayerfully quiet our minds and let God speak. I think in doing this, we hear the scriptures and what they have to say in our circumstances. But if what I think I am hearing doesn't jive with compassion, then it is most likely not from God.

Long answer, maybe not helpful. But, I am not overly concerned with Israel from an eschatological (= end times) standpoint. A bigger sadness is how many in Israel do not recognize the love of God revealed in Jesus. And much of that failure to recognize is due to the hatred express by people in Jesus' name (think Crusads, Pogroms, Holocaust). The biggest enemy of evangelism, from about 300AD to present, has been hatred expressed by people who claim to follow Jesus.

Pray for your in-laws. You never know when the Holy Spirit will grip a heart and make a person see as Jesus says. I am praying the Holy Spirit will do that to me today.

- Rob