Diedre Riggs posted the following excellent piece on her blog -
http://www.deidrariggs.com/2013/09/26/a-post-for-you-to-read-while-i-wait-for-more-courage/
Below is what I wrote in the comment section. Please, read her piece before reading my response.
http://www.deidrariggs.com/2013/09/26/a-post-for-you-to-read-while-i-wait-for-more-courage/
Below is what I wrote in the comment section. Please, read her piece before reading my response.
In some of my
experiences I have found that conversations related to race have been effective
when race was not the presenting issue, but comes up in the context of a
conversation already in process. Coming out of seminary, I knew my work was too
white. So I determined I would only pastor a church that was ethnically and
racially diverse. Fortunately most churches in Northern Virginia, just outside
Washington DC, fit that bill. I was a called to a very small church with a
congregation that was roughly %40 non-white and also had a Spanish speaking
congregation. Obviously that means the congregations was 60% white, maybe even
70%. I have not pastored in a context in which I was an ethnic minority. But I
have been in diverse contexts.
In those settings,
the conversations were initially about Bible, forgiveness, grace, mission,
ministry, resurrection, Jesus - all the topics that a church would discuss in
sermons or Bible studies. Those are (or should be) consistent topics across the
board in Christian churches. Because that church was diverse, I was having
those conversations with people of Chinese backgrounds, or African American, or
Sudanese, or Mexican or Bolivian or Salvadorian. The starting point was not
race or diversity, but Bible or Jesus. Then, entering through one of those
doors, race & ethnicity would arise as a secondary topic. We had already
established shared faith in Jesus, so we trusted each other.
To this idea of a
topic (other than race) as the doorway to a conversation on race, I add a
crucial piece: listening. It is essential that we listen to each other, and
ultimately essential that the members of the majority culture (us whites)
listen with great respect and without defensiveness. I have noted in the
comment thread to this post how much listening I must do, over and over. In
that little church where I pastored, I could not convince the Hispanic kids
that they were as American as I am. When they said, 'American,' they meant
white. They bought into the idea that European-American culture is normative.
That mindset must be confronted by minorities, but also by us whites. As long
as we think America is us, there is a whole lot of America we are just missing
and we are spiritually impoverished for it. Even worse! As we stay huddled in
suburban white enclaves, there is a whole lot of Jesus we are missing. That is
not just sad. It is sinful on the part of the system and on the part of anyone
who accepts what the system serves.
(1) Enter the race
conversation through a doorway other than race.
(2) Listen. Whites, listen twice as much.
(2) Listen. Whites, listen twice as much.
A third principle
that has become significant in my life more and more is relational safety. We
have made it a core value at the church I pastor now. Let the church be a safe
place. This means someone might utter a racially insensitive remark. When that
happens, the individual may be confronted, but the injured party makes a
commitment up front to confront in love and to offer grace. Church is a safe
place to mess up. Church is a safe place to confront. Church is a place where
friendships are strengthened by instances of real forgiveness. This idea of
safety is so hard to achieve. In that diverse church I mentioned, I had far
more real conversations about race in my 7th, 8th, and 9th years than in my first.
When you're preaching someone's funeral, it is not a black man's funeral. It is
a dead man's funeral. When you baptize, it is not a black man you're immersing.
He is a born again child of God and in that moment, when he is in your arms and
under the water, trusting God with his life, walls come crashing down.
Obviously, some
disclaimers are needed her. D.D. is talking about creating diversity. What I
have mentioned came about where diversity was already in play. In New York
City, in DC, LA, and places like that, this is far more doable than in
homogeneous communities. In those places, the conversation about race can also
happen, and should. But that would require another post or maybe an essay or a
book.
One thing I do think. Even there, even
in small towns where all racial groups might "stick to their own
kind" (whatever that means), I think the starting point should not be
race. I think if we (the worldwide community of Christ-followers) can make the
Jesus-way and the Jesus-life the starting point, we'll find more satisfying
results. We begin in Jesus, and in Him, the much needed race conversation
arises. Then we achieve diversity, but not diversity for diversity's sake. The
diversity we have is blessed because in him there is no Jew nor Greek, no black
nor white, no Korean nor Mexican. All are one in Christ
No comments:
Post a Comment